Has the first evidence of another universe been seen?

universe-header.gif

Astronomers announced in August 2007 the discovery of a large hole at the edge of our universe. Since then, theoretical physicist and cosmologist Laura Mersini-Houghton and colleagues have claimed it is an “unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our own.”

The article entitled “Astronomers Find Enormous Hole in the Universe” discusses the August 2007 discovery of the hole. It is located at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory website.

Dr. Laura Mersini-Houghton is a theoretical physicist and cosmologist at the University of North Carolina (Chapel Hill).

The hole is estimated to be almost one billion light-years across, where one light-year is about 9.5 trillion kilometers (5.9 trillion miles) and is located within the constellation Eridanus.

The Mersini-Houghton team states that the hole is another universe at the edge of our own universe. Such an explanation, if true, would be the first experimental evidence of such an exo-universe, or a universe outside of our own universe.

Several teams of astronomers have used data from the NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to make examinations of this large hole. The hole first showed up in images of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, the radiation left over from the formation of the universe (what we call the big bang).

In images made by WMAP back in 2004, the volume of the hole showed up as being of a colder temperature than surrounding volumes of space because of less energy being ejected from the region.

The hole is not actually devoid of matter, only has far fewer galaxies and galactic clusters than normally found in a comparable volume of space. It is estimated that the hole has about 20 to 45% less galaxies than normal, which contributes to it being colder than other volumes of space.

Not knowing how far away the hole was located astronomers then began looking at the Sloan data to make comparisons with galaxies. They found that the hole was about 900 light-years across and about 8 billion light-years away. This hole is the largest one ever found, and is difficult to explain, with current models of the universe, as to why it exists. Standard cosmology theory says that such a large void in space is exceedingly unlikely.

Several teams have made claims at to the explanation for this hole. Some cosmologists say that large hole in space is a “topological defect,” a large knot in space.

The Mersini-Houghton team, however, says it is another universe at the edge of our own. They looked at string theory for the explanation. In string theory, 10500 universes (or string vacuums) are described, each with unique properties. They contend that the largeness of our universe is due to its vacuum counterbalancing gravity. This counter-gravity of the vacuum keeps our universe very large (rather than shrinking due to gravity)—larger than the other multitude of universes. The team says that smaller universes are positioned at the edge of our universe, and because of this interaction they are seen by us.

The team predicts that another giant void will eventually be found. The already found void is in the northern hemisphere. They contend another one will be found in the southern hemisphere.

Cosmologists are mixed as to the conclusions from the Mersini-Houghton team. Some call it very interesting, while others call it very speculative. Future tests will be made that will probably validate or reject their conclusion.

Source: ITWire

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • YahooMyWeb

Email This Post Email This Post
Print This Post Print This Post

Comments

9 Responses to “Has the first evidence of another universe been seen?”

  1. Jason Foreman on November 26th, 2007 4:00 pm

    This is extremely exciting to hear about. This goes very well with the book i’m reading called The Elegant Universe. it talks about String Theory and how it can be used to describe all that is in this article.

  2. Will on November 26th, 2007 4:46 pm

    In one portion of your article you state that the hole is estimated at 1-billion light years across, then a few paragraphs later you say that it is 900 light years across. That is a huge difference. Which is it?

  3. myahon on November 26th, 2007 7:45 pm

    to will: it said 900 across and 1 billion away.

  4. Adam on November 26th, 2007 8:07 pm

    to myahon:

    Will’s right.
    “The hole is estimated to be almost one billion light-years across, where one light-year is about 9.5 trillion kilometers (5.9 trillion miles) and is located within the constellation Eridanus.”, “They found that the hole was about 900 light-years across and about 8 billion light-years away.”

    So which is it?

  5. Justin on November 27th, 2007 9:19 am

    To Jason: ‘The Elegant Universe’ is an incredible book - don’t even think of putting it down.

    As for the article: I love the implications, but hate the ’science’ presented here. Several unquestionably outlandish claims are made, with no hint of supporting evidence. I’m convinced the researchers must must have presented some strong evidence before making such a claim, and am very dissappointed to see none of it presented to us here. I’ll have to do some independent research on this.

    For the size/distance discrepancy: Another great example of fine journalism. If you’re going to report a ‘discovery’ of this magnitude with so little supporting evidence, at least make sure that the figures you DO choose to present are - if not accurate - then at least consistent.

  6. Kevin on November 28th, 2007 6:12 pm

    Does anybody know if this hole has been officially named yet? Surely we can’t just go on referring to it as “That Big Hole In The Universe They Found In August.”

  7. James C on January 20th, 2008 8:07 am

    This then contradicts what other scientists have said, previously as some people may have remembered from old science lessons being told that the universe is infinate and never ends, so saying that there is another universe much mean that the universe must end unless 2 universe’s overlap which would cause a problem I’d.

  8. zvlgmwip wohzeijpr on February 14th, 2008 2:19 am

    mcje lmuphaq pcksdjyb jcxpgmer lyvwcher jnuver deaqpghc

  9. La La on April 4th, 2008 7:58 pm

    u nerds my think ur inpressin people but not at least not me anyway. ur all freaks

Leave a Reply